[141785] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Frank Bulk)
Sat Jun 11 17:09:34 2011

From: "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk@iname.com>
To: "'Leo Bicknell'" <bicknell@ufp.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110610144751.GA25027@ussenterprise.ufp.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 16:09:28 -0500
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Reply-To: frnkblk@iname.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

RA is fine for residential use, its enterprises and institutions that would
benefit most from a route option with DHCPv6.

Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: Leo Bicknell [mailto:bicknell@ufp.org] 
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 9:48 AM
To: Ray Soucy; Iljitsch van Beijnum
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6

<snip>

I really beieve this is going to be the single largest impediment to
deploying _end user_ IPv6.

-- 
       Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post