[141655] in North American Network Operators' Group
The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
Fri Jun 10 06:03:13 2011
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DF104C4.8050107@foobar.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:01:25 +0200
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 9 jun 2011, at 19:37, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>> DHCPv6 does not provide route information because this task is =
handled
>> by RA in IPv6.
> Thankfully this silliness is in the process of being fixed,
So where do I point out the stupidity of trying to fix this =
non-brokenness?
> along with prefix delegation
Also works fine.
> - so in future, there will be no requirement for either RA or =
cartloads of per-interface configuration on routers.
Good luck with that. Next month, the last major operating system will =
add support for DHCPv6. Which was published in 2003.
So now you want to change some more stuff so in 2019 we can finally =
actually start USING DHCPv6?=
