[141440] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Cameron Byrne)
Wed Jun 8 09:11:27 2011

In-Reply-To: <AEAF5DF9-A5D8-4B0C-BBE3-833C0FBE0B86@delong.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 06:09:07 -0700
From: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
>
> On Jun 8, 2011, at 5:47 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:59 PM, Martin Millnert wrote:
>>>
>>>> Owen,
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
>>>>> LSN is required when access providers come across the following two
>>>>> combined constraints:
>>>>>
>>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A01. =A0 =A0 =A0No more IPv4 addresses to give to custom=
ers.
>>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A02. =A0 =A0 =A0No ability to deploy those customers on =
IPv6.
>>>>
>>>> 2 has little bearing on need of LSN to access v4. =A0Insufficient amou=
nt
>>>> of IPv4 addresses =3D> LSN required.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Martin
>>>
>>> No, if you have the option of deploying the customers on IPv6, you don'=
t
>>> need LSN.
>>>
>>> The problem is that until the vast majority of content is dual-stack, y=
ou can't
>>> deploy customers on IPv6 without IPv4.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> cough cough NAT64/DNS64 ...
>
> Doesn't solve the problem unless your users are all on cell-phone browser=
s
> that don't do a lot of the things most users do with real internet connec=
tions.
>

Most of my users are on cell phone browsers :)

Furthermore, i can choose which ones get ipv4-only NAT44 and which get
ipv6-only + NAT64

Now, only if there was major cell phone OEM support ....


Also, i would like to extend the idea that as IPv6 becomes dominant in
the next few years (pending access networks), the need for IPv4 access
will wane and LSN for the IPv4 will become more acceptable as IPv4 is
just the long tail.

Cameron


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post