[141213] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Mon Jun 6 13:15:16 2011
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110606125556.GB12144@hiwaay.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:12:17 -0700
To: Chris Adams <cmadams@hiwaay.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Jun 6, 2011, at 5:55 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> said:
>> You're not that atypical either, at least compared to US users. The
>> following very common applications are known to have problems
>> with LSN:
>> The HTTPs Server on TiVO boxes
>=20
> I'm curious: how does this have any problem with any particular NAT
> implementation? The TiVo HTTPS server is only intended to be accessed
> from the local LAN, so what happens outside your house (e.g. LSN)
> shouldn't matter.
I disagree. It is allowed to be accessed anywhere from within your =
household.
A household is defined as the members who live there regardless of where
in the world they are at any particular time. Since I spend a great deal =
of time
traveling, I routinely download shows from my TiVO over the internet =
using
the https server on the TiVO box. Fortunately, my TiVO boxes have public
IPv4 addresses and this is not an issue.
I have confirmed with legal counsel and with TiVO that my interpretation =
of
the term household is valid within the meaning of their license =
agreement.
Owen
