[141212] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol (Re: Microsoft's
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Mon Jun 6 13:11:28 2011
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DEC959D.1080106@mompl.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:08:21 -0700
To: Jeroen van Aart <jeroen@mompl.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Jun 6, 2011, at 1:53 AM, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
> Owen DeLong wrote:
>> FIrst I've heard of such a thing. The original organizers of W6D have =
zero
>> motivation to try such a thing and I can't imagine why they would =
even
>> consider it for more than a picosecond.
>=20
> It'd be a great way to get a point across. ;-)
>=20
No, it really wouldn't. What it would be, instead, would be an event =
with little or
no participation except people who are already very IPv6 aware and =
committed.
The goal here is to help bring IPv6 awareness to a larger group and =
demonstrate
that it can be deployed without significant damage to the existing =
infrastructure.
Owen
