[140495] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Yahoo and IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Thu May 12 13:11:56 2011
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimNZEsoweALVowyAcRWmuHjf=_3pg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 10:09:46 -0700
To: Scott Whyte <swhyte@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On May 12, 2011, at 9:06 AM, Scott Whyte wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 23:10, Franck Martin <fmartin@linkedin.com> =
wrote:
>> I think the yahoo test should just differentiate between no IPv6 and =
IPv6
>> is slow (test between 3s and 10s). Like:
>>=20
>> We have detected that you have IPv6 and will be able to access our =
site on
>> IPv6 day, but your user experience may not be as good as with IPv4, =
you
>> may consider disabling IPv6.
>>=20
>=20
> Measurements during the experiment won't be directly comparable to
> those before/after, at least as far as I can see. So they will be
> informative, but its the slope of the brokenness line before/after
> that will determine when IPv6 is not an impediment to itself.
>=20
> -Scott
I think it's a little more complex.
I think there are two lines. A line representing brokenness with AAAA =
records
enabled and a line representing brokenness without AAAA records.
The first line is trending downwards while the second line is trending =
upwards
and wil soon be making a rather pronounced increase in its slope.
When these two lines cross, I think it will become virtually inevitable =
that
those who are ready to do so will publish their AAAA records.
Owen
