[140487] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Yahoo and IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott Whyte)
Thu May 12 12:07:18 2011
In-Reply-To: <C9F1D05B.A87A%fmartin@linkedin.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 09:06:24 -0700
From: Scott Whyte <swhyte@gmail.com>
To: Franck Martin <fmartin@linkedin.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 23:10, Franck Martin <fmartin@linkedin.com> wrote:
> I think the yahoo test should just differentiate between no IPv6 and IPv6
> is slow (test between 3s and 10s). Like:
>
> We have detected that you have IPv6 and will be able to access our site on
> IPv6 day, but your user experience may not be as good as with IPv4, you
> may consider disabling IPv6.
>
Measurements during the experiment won't be directly comparable to
those before/after, at least as far as I can see. So they will be
informative, but its the slope of the brokenness line before/after
that will determine when IPv6 is not an impediment to itself.
-Scott
