[140393] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Yahoo and IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
Tue May 10 16:59:06 2011
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <3DC34A9C-2AC6-466E-8895-3601FD7DCCF6@kumari.net>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 22:58:51 +0200
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 10 mei 2011, at 22:31, Warren Kumari wrote:
>> :: I applaud the first step, but I'm bothered by the fact that no =
second step is planned.
> Igor is right on both counts here -- 0.05% is definitely noticeable at =
these sorts of scale,
Ok, removed my infamatory reply. But tell me how 0.05% is visible in the =
up/down motions of traffic as it starts raining, there is something =
especially good/bad on TV, people have to reboot because of a Windows =
update or whatever.
Earlier today I tracerouted the top 1000 websites as per Alexa. I =
couldn't resolve the DNS for 6 of them. The internet is never 100% up.
> I'm also a little surprised that you figured that there were no plans =
past the event -- much of the point of this is for data gathering -- did =
you figure folk were just going to gather the data and then ignore it?
I asked the ISOC press people about this after they sent me their press =
release but they never replied (they may have replied to my message but =
not with an answer to the question). There is nothing on the ISOC site =
that mentions anything happening after june 8.
Of course I'm assuming individual participants will do stuff, but that =
doesn't change that this IPv6 day as it stands now is a one-off event, =
not the first step towards the Ultimate Goal.=
