[140257] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 implementation NANOG list
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ben Jencks)
Fri May 6 17:15:40 2011
In-Reply-To: <20110506205920.GA21677@gnaea.lv0.in>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 17:14:39 -0400
From: Ben Jencks <ben@bjencks.net>
To: Romain Boissat <r.boissat@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 16:59, Romain Boissat <r.boissat@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 01:53:51PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> I'm honestly not sure, but, check RFCs:
>>
>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 3315 (OPTION_RELAY_MSG)
>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 4580 (Relay Agent Subscriber-ID)
>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 5007 (Various LQ related Options, including OPTION_=
LQ_RELAY_DATA)
>
> Or even 3315 (INTERFACE ID). It seems to suit here.
This Cisco whitepaper makes it look like it's Remote-ID (See section
Useful DHCPv6 deployment features and options):
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6553/whitepape=
r_C11-472610.html
-Ben
