[140256] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 implementation NANOG list
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Romain Boissat)
Fri May 6 16:59:35 2011
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 22:59:20 +0200
From: Romain Boissat <r.boissat@gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <C076ABAF-6B34-4BE1-85FD-B48910FAE449@delong.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 01:53:51PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
> I'm honestly not sure, but, check RFCs:
>=20
> 3315 (OPTION_RELAY_MSG)
> 4580 (Relay Agent Subscriber-ID)
> 5007 (Various LQ related Options, including OPTION_LQ_RELAY_DATA)
Or even 3315 (INTERFACE ID). It seems to suit here.
--=20
Romain Boissat
chroot-me.in
--ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAk3EYSgACgkQJl1+jWjSsi/rhgCeP1VduxXkwww7qqZY9nBwRqPm
ZBkAmwR2cDn8iA3AMDLcE8I31GYcOKVW
=bJQc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd--
