[139294] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Re: v6 Avian Carriers?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Richard Barnes)
Fri Apr 1 16:47:01 2011
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim5nH=zdd70u2Ogj3k6svZC=vmz_5ouERvMZSxS@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 22:45:49 +0200
From: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
To: Dorn Hetzel <dorn@hetzel.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org, Brandon Ross <bross@pobox.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Be careful what you wish for:
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ymbk-aplusp>
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Dorn Hetzel <dorn@hetzel.org> wrote:
> I was thinking today would be a good day to write an RFC for "fractional
> DHCP" where end-users can get issued say 1/64 of an v4 IP, say
> 155.229.10.20:1024-2047. =A0Other users on the same DSLAM, etc behind the
> carrier NAT would have other shares of the same public IP. =A0 :)
>
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Brandon Ross <bross@pobox.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, GP Wooden wrote:
>>
>> =A0I wonder on the carrier would survive a DoS attack ...
>>>
>>
>> I'm not sure about that, but we know that, if a Sullenberger unit has be=
en
>> installed, a large aircraft can survive a DoS attack perpetrated by the
>> avian carrier.
>>
>> --
>> Brandon Ross =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0AIM:
>> =A0BrandonNRoss
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 ICQ: =A02269442
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Skyp=
e: =A0brandonross =A0Yahoo: =A0BrandonNRoss
>>
>>
>
