[139293] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: v6 Avian Carriers?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Cutler James R)
Fri Apr 1 16:45:04 2011
From: Cutler James R <james.cutler@consultant.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=oU20SETdri5vrKA0E3zHTL8MxkP9gmdwE7iBR@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 16:44:54 -0400
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Apr 1, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Dorn Hetzel wrote:
> I'm thinking both TCP and UDP, and for ICMP don't NAT's use the sequence
> number field to keep them separate ?
> <SNIP/>
In my experience, the Avian Carriers usually eat the NATs.
James R. Cutler
james.cutler@consultant.com
