[139229] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 SEO implecations?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Franck Martin)
Wed Mar 30 20:20:38 2011
From: Franck Martin <fmartin@linkedin.com>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:22:17 +0000
In-Reply-To: <F5945003-92DC-482D-AFD2-C8E79C149BDB@bsdboy.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 3/31/11 11:55 , "Wil Schultz" <wschultz@bsdboy.com> wrote:
>
>
>On Mar 30, 2011, at 4:39 PM, Alexander Harrowell <a.harrowell@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 29 Mar 2011 17:54:27 Wil Schultz wrote:
>>> On Mar 29, 2011, at 3:51 AM, Franck Martin wrote:
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> And here's a breakdown of which user agents are seen on which ip, as
>>>you can=20
>> see the user-agent doesn't exactly match IP range.
>>>=20
>>> Googlebot-Image/1.0
>>=20
>>> Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Googlebot/2.1;
>>>+http://www.google.com/bot.html);
>>=20
>>> DoCoMo/2.0 N905i(c100;TB;W24H16) (compatible; Googlebot-Mobile/2.1;
>> +http://www.google.com/bot.html)
>>=20
>>> SAMSUNG-SGH-E250/1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
>> UP.Browser/6.2.3.3.c.1.101 (GUI) MMP/2.0 (compatible;
>>Googlebot-Mobile/2.1;
>> +http://www.google.com/bot.html)
>>=20
>> Interesting that there are Googlebot mobile devices! Perhaps
>>user-experience=20
>> testing of some kind? Googlers? Or IPv6 testing of the devices
>>themselves?=20
>> Although those user strings are indicative of not very recent,
>>non-Android=20
>> phones.
>>=20
>> Would be interesting to see the percentages of traffic by each user
>>agent.
>> --=20
>> The only thing worse than e-mail disclaimers...is people who send
>>e-mail to=20
>> lists complaining about them
>
>I've got the logs still but I've torn down the VIP. I'll send hit count
>percentages tomorrow.
Interesting:
http://www.google.com/search?q=3Dsite%3Aipv6.cnn.com
http://www.bing.com/search?q=3Dsite%3Aipv6.cnn.com
