[139226] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 SEO implecations?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alexander Harrowell)
Wed Mar 30 18:40:38 2011
From: Alexander Harrowell <a.harrowell@gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:39:13 +0100
In-Reply-To: <4F427F24-E9D4-4B7B-ACCF-9F9E52D8C336@bsdboy.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--nextPart1570926.eEvfYppWzO
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tuesday 29 Mar 2011 17:54:27 Wil Schultz wrote:
> On Mar 29, 2011, at 3:51 AM, Franck Martin wrote:
>=20
>=20
> And here's a breakdown of which user agents are seen on which ip, as you =
can=20
see the user-agent doesn't exactly match IP range.=20
>=20
> Googlebot-Image/1.0
> Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Googlebot/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html);=
=20
> DoCoMo/2.0 N905i(c100;TB;W24H16) (compatible; Googlebot-Mobile/2.1;=20
+http://www.google.com/bot.html)
> SAMSUNG-SGH-E250/1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1=20
UP.Browser/6.2.3.3.c.1.101 (GUI) MMP/2.0 (compatible; Googlebot-Mobile/2.1;=
=20
+http://www.google.com/bot.html)
Interesting that there are Googlebot mobile devices! Perhaps user-experienc=
e=20
testing of some kind? Googlers? Or IPv6 testing of the devices themselves?=
=20
Although those user strings are indicative of not very recent, non-Android=
=20
phones.
Would be interesting to see the percentages of traffic by each user agent.
=2D-=20
The only thing worse than e-mail disclaimers...is people who send e-mail to=
=20
lists complaining about them
--nextPart1570926.eEvfYppWzO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEABECAAYFAk2TvzIACgkQ0c69vkueJcTVSwCfWXz2BKHB/XqDercM1JonTSwI
8NMAn3Eq3Ypc/NEo5N4grZUDA0GRFpPp
=0eRN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart1570926.eEvfYppWzO--
