[139175] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 SEO implecations?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Mon Mar 28 21:12:39 2011
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <1301353811.2810.78.camel@karl>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:07:47 -0700
To: Karl Auer <kauer@biplane.com.au>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mar 28, 2011, at 4:10 PM, Karl Auer wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 15:55 -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> If you're worried about SEO, go with native IPv6 and then deploy AAAAs
>> for WWW.domain.foo.
>
> Why is native IPv6 needed? I'd have thought a tunnel would be fine, too.
>
He was worried about the latency of tunnels creating penalties for SEO
purposes, but, otherwise, yes, that works too.
Since he stated a desire to avoid tunnels as an initial area of concern,
I went with his original statement.
Owen
