[139174] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 SEO implecations?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nicholas Meredith)
Mon Mar 28 20:01:15 2011
In-Reply-To: <8C26A4FDAE599041A13EB499117D3C286B3F1F41@ex-mb-1.corp.atlasnetworks.us>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:01:10 +1000
From: Nicholas Meredith <nicholas@udhaonline.net>
To: Nathan Eisenberg <nathan@atlasnetworks.us>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org Group" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> Why do you even need a AAAA record to do that? Just do a traceroute to the
> v6 address. The temporary AAAA record seems to do nothing useful in your
> proposed procedure.
>
> Easiest hack to test site usability: Modify your hosts file. Don't even
> publish the record in DNS until you're ready. Then there's no SEO
> implications. :)
>
You could go direct to the v6 addy, but using your hosts file for a dns
record isn't going to work for the remote route servers I suggest testing
from. Using a temp AAAA doesn't hurt, or lose you anything, and is
technically a more accurate test, ultimatly I leave it to your discretion.
\n
