[139169] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 SEO implecations?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (TR Shaw)
Mon Mar 28 19:23:18 2011
From: TR Shaw <tshaw@oitc.com>
In-Reply-To: <8C26A4FDAE599041A13EB499117D3C286B3F1E65@ex-mb-1.corp.atlasnetworks.us>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:21:43 -0400
To: Nathan Eisenberg <nathan@atlasnetworks.us>,
NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mar 28, 2011, at 7:17 PM, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
>> Why is native IPv6 needed? I'd have thought a tunnel would be fine, =
too.
>=20
> I believe the concern is that the higher latency of a tunnel would =
impact SEO rankings.
True but you live with what you can get acces to ;-)
Tom=
