[139168] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 SEO implecations?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (TR Shaw)
Mon Mar 28 19:21:32 2011
From: TR Shaw <tshaw@oitc.com>
In-Reply-To: <1301353811.2810.78.camel@karl>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:20:51 -0400
To: Karl Auer <kauer@biplane.com.au>,
NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mar 28, 2011, at 7:10 PM, Karl Auer wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 15:55 -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> If you're worried about SEO, go with native IPv6 and then deploy =
AAAAs
>> for WWW.domain.foo.
>=20
> Why is native IPv6 needed? I'd have thought a tunnel would be fine, =
too.
So why does=20
www A 127.0.0.1
www AAAA ::1
Preclude a tunnel? I can't get native here to my IPv6 is tunneled thru =
he (Thanks he) but that doesn't change dual DNS entires.
(Note used loopback as an example)
Tom
