[139050] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The growth of municipal broadband networks
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leo Bicknell)
Fri Mar 25 16:12:10 2011
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:11:04 -0700
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>
To: "nanog@nanog.org list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Mail-Followup-To: "nanog@nanog.org list" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <4D8CDF79.9060404@paulgraydon.co.uk>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message written on Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 08:31:21AM -1000, Paul Graydon=
wrote:
> I'm curious how the feeling is on NANOG about shifting such provision=20
> towards municipal instead of corporations? I guess a rough summary of=20
> the competing views I've heard so far are:
If you look at the services going into most homes, what you find
are monopolies. Some are government run, some are regulated
monopolies, and there are now lots of hybrid models.
The funamental issue is that it is not cost effective to anyone
(governments, corporations, or citizens) to build multiple gas,
water, sewer, electrical, telephone or television distribution
systems to every home. Remember that when these services were
invisioned and first deployed telephone and television did not
compete.
It is only in very recent times that we have been able to overlay
Internet on both cable and television, and to have television
competition via satellite.
To that end, I think the US would be much better off with fiber to
the home on a single distribution infrastructure. That could be
owned and operated by the municipality (like the water system) or
owned and operated by a corporation granted an exclusive right to
service an area (think telephone, at least pre CLEC).
Where you immediately run into a snag is the next layer up. Should
the government provide IP services, if the fiber is government
owned? Should private companies be required to offer competitors
access to provide IP services if the fiber is privately owned?
There's a lot of space inside these questions for different models,
and I think there are at least a half dozen in play in different
communities.
Having looked around the world I personally believe most communities
would be best served if the government provided layer-1 distribution,
possibly with some layer 2 switching, but then allowed any commercial
entity to come in and offer layer 3 services. For simplicity of
argument I like people to envision the local government fiber agency
(like your water authority) dropping off a 1 port fiber 4 port
copper switch in your basement. On that device they can create a
layer 2 VLAN/VPN/Tunnel from any of the copper ports to any provider
in the town CO. You could buy video from one, voice from one, and
internet from another, on three different ports. You could buy
everything from one provider.
The actual deployments are a bit more complex, but I actually think
if in new construction we could drop telephone and coax in the
neighborhoods, and deploy fiber to the home it would be cheaper to
construct, cheaper to operate in the long term, and would end up
giving consumers a lot more choice. It is for all those reasons I
expect any established business to be firmly against it.
--=20
Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD)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=nSEW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X--
