[138988] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Nortel, in bankruptcy, sells IPv4 address block for $7.5 million
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Thu Mar 24 18:43:26 2011
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <A48784CD-1F4A-4D5E-8C6F-4D6B86005F32@virtualized.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:26:32 -0600
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
The judge definitely ruled that the transfer had to be done in a manner that=
complied with ARIN policy and made it clear that the recipient was, indeed,
required to sign the RSA.
So, yes, Kremen also lost on the address policy basis, which I believe may
have been an additional ruling subsequent to what is covered at the cited UR=
L.
Owen
Sent from my iPad
On Mar 24, 2011, at 12:24 PM, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> wrote:
> On Mar 24, 2011, at 8:15 AM, William Herrin wrote:
>> Legacy address transferability has been disputed before. Kremen v.
>> ARIN. Kremen lost.
>=20
> Yes, Kremen lost, but not based on anything related to address policy:
>=20
> http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2007/01/kremen_loses_ch_1.htm
>=20
> Regards,
> -drc
>=20
