[138535] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: estimation of number of DFZ IPv4 routes at peak in the future
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (George Bonser)
Wed Mar 9 12:06:02 2011
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 09:05:57 -0800
In-Reply-To: <m24o7c7ksy.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: "George Bonser" <gbonser@seven.com>
To: "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> the last serious satainc phylters died in 2001. sales&marketing
> pressure. when eyecandy.com is behind a /27, or your s&m folk
> sell to weenie.foo who wants you to announce their /26, it will be
> the end of the /24 barrier.
Sure, you can sell to someone who wants to announce a /26 and you can
carry the route, but you can't force your peers or your peers' peers to
take it. That's what I meant by the experience possibly varying. It
might work, it might not from some locations.
> > v6 being where the growth is it will get priority.
>=20
> we wish. wanna start a pool on the growth of v6 announcements vs
> new multi-homed v4 announcements?
I meant growth in traffic, not routing table. If traffic is growing on
v6 and a network with dual-stacked routers comes under routing table
pressure, v6 might win in the filtering decision.
