|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 05:38:25 +0900 From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> To: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> In-Reply-To: <D34946D8-6148-42B0-996E-C978C0BA790B@hopcount.ca> Cc: NANOG Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org >> o if ipv6 can not operate as the only protocol, and we will be out >> of ipv4 space and have to deploy 6-only networks, it damned well >> better be able to stand on its own. > > Do you think I was suggesting that IPv6 as a protocol doesn't need to > be able to stand on its own two feet? you may want to read your words and the thread which followed. randy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |