[137910] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Feb 22 16:59:13 2011
To: Benson Schliesser <bensons@queuefull.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 22 Feb 2011 02:29:23 CST."
<41DC9C32-7902-459E-A4FA-8A70EED53AB4@queuefull.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:54:42 -0500
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>, ARIN-PPML List <arin-ppml@arin.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1298411682_11650P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 02:29:23 CST, Benson Schliesser said:
> There seems to be a position, taken by others on these lists, that IPv6
> is the only address family that matters. Interestingly, this position
> seems to be most pronounced from people not involved in operating
> production networks.
"most pronounced from people not involved in operating production networks
that are way behind the planning curve for IPv6 deployment".
There, fixed that for you.
(Full disclosure - yesterday's MRTG graphs show our border routers averaging
4Gbit/sec of IPv4 traffic and 150 Mbits/sec of IPv6 - so 4% or so of our
production off-campus traffic is already IPv6)
--==_Exmh_1298411682_11650P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFNZDCicC3lWbTT17ARAl/sAJ0XwvxVO2itGfrHTHodMYpppt9CVACg8p3d
xkOnYzaJElu63JPlrVt9960=
=ttHu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1298411682_11650P--
