[137736] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6naysayer...)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Cameron Byrne)
Fri Feb 18 14:10:25 2011
In-Reply-To: <5A6D953473350C4B9995546AFE9939EE0BC13C2A@RWC-EX1.corp.seven.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:09:32 -0800
From: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: George Bonser <gbonser@seven.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:42 AM, George Bonser <gbonser@seven.com> wrote:
>>
>> You never been told something like "We don't do (or stock) that
> because
>> there's no demand for it! You know, you're the Nth person to ask about
>> it
>> today." I have, and many more times than merely once.
>>
>> --
>> Mike Andrews, W5EGO
>> mikea@mikea.ath.cx
>> Tired old sysadmin
>
> Right, so what it takes is someone out there to create the demand. =A0It
> would actually be a great public service if someone were to do that.
> Some social networking, gaming, or some other sort of site that only the
> "cool kids" can access via v6, maybe.
>
> Nothing drives people nuts more than knowing there is something out
> there that they can't access. =A0Create something like that AND generate
> some buzz surrounding it, particularly if someone hears people talking
> about it and they can't access it themselves to see what the buzz is all
> about, and you have just built the required demand for v6 migration. =A0I=
t
> is going to take v6-only content to do that, I think. Frankly, a v6 only
> service is easier to build and deploy. =A0Dual stacking causes problems
> with many applications, if it is native v6 and v6 only, it removes a lot
> of the "issues" with v6 migration.
>
100% agree. No volunteers yet for making their awesome new service IPv6-on=
ly :(
