[137734] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6naysayer...)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Franck Martin)
Fri Feb 18 13:57:54 2011
In-Reply-To: <5A6D953473350C4B9995546AFE9939EE0BC13C2A@RWC-EX1.corp.seven.com>
From: Franck Martin <franck@genius.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 07:53:52 +1300
To: George Bonser <gbonser@seven.com>
Cc: "<nanog@nanog.org>" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
http://www.jetcafe.org/~npc/isp/large.html
If you take the 5 top US ISPs and get them to do dual stack IPv6, that's 50 m=
illion subscribers in the US only.
I think google and others will notice some serious traffic happening.
It took a market share of 10 to 20% of Mozilla for web developers to go back=
to support ALL browsers. Same for mobile web site a 10% surfing rate got ma=
ny companies to develop web sites for mobiles.
If I recall Comcast and Time Warner are participating in IPv6 day. This shou=
ld create enough eyeballs to show on web analytics graph and provide the shi=
ft that makes nat444 irrelevant.
For a network operator I'm looking at the ipv6 ipv4 ASN ratio. Once it passe=
s 10% we will have a snow ball effect in the core.
Toute connaissance est une r=C3=A9ponse =C3=A0 une question
>=20
