[137361] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SmartNet Alternatives
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael Loftis)
Fri Feb 11 16:27:04 2011
In-Reply-To: <060EDFC2221B014B9504AC06B747F58A499BCC3B57@ex01.alentus.lan>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:26:56 -0700
From: Michael Loftis <mloftis@wgops.com>
To: John Macleod <JMacleod@alentus.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Cisco is making noises that they'll eventually be restricting software
access to ONLY those devices which have an active SmartNet contract
associated to your CCO account. I don't know where this currently
stands, and it sure will be a huge pain in my rear if/when it happens.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 1:41 PM, John Macleod <JMacleod@alentus.com> wrote:
> Just interested in other peoples experience to companies offering alterna=
tives to SmartNet?
>
> Pros/Cons/Tradeoffs?
>
> We currently have a mix of SmartNet and internal parts supply.
>
> John
>
>
> __
> John Macleod
> Alentus UK Limited
> Seymour House
> South Street
> Bromley
> BR1 1RH
> =A0+44 (0)208 315 5800
> =A0+44 (0)208 315 5801 fax
> alentus.co.uk =A0| =A0alentus.com
>
> "Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
>
> This e-mail (and/or any attachment) contains information, which is confid=
ential and intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee=
(s). If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy, distribute or=
use it for any purpose or disclose the contents to any person. If you have=
received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender. The i=
nformation contained in this e-mail (and any attachments) is supplied in go=
od faith, but the sender shall not be under any liability in damages or oth=
erwise for any reliance that may be placed upon it by the recipient, nor do=
es it constitute a contract in any way. Any comments or opinions expressed =
are those of the originator not of Alentus Corporation unless otherwise exp=
ressly stated."
>
>
