[136779] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: My upstream ISP does not support IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jack Bates)
Fri Feb 4 20:34:33 2011
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 19:33:29 -0600
From: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=n3s3N=wdSVe+qA4nENix38NhXCFDSZLD69jxk@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 2/4/2011 7:17 PM, Anthony Pardini wrote:
> how do the routes they offer compare?
Speaking generically, everyone's routes suck. It's also not a fully fair
comparison of reachability. You can see my network from HE and Level3,
but if see me through Level3 without the use of a tunnel, it is probably
the better path (which is why I prepend out the tunnel to HE). On the
other hand, there are cases where HE is better connectivity, even with
the horrid tunnel.
Jack
