[136591] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: And so it ends...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeffrey Lyon)
Thu Feb 3 16:03:35 2011
In-Reply-To: <D1134B09-E0C9-4AF5-94BD-640DDC5130D6@cs.fiu.edu>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 15:51:31 -0500
From: Jeffrey Lyon <jeffrey.lyon@blacklotus.net>
To: Ernie Rubi <ernesto@cs.fiu.edu>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Ernie Rubi <ernesto@cs.fiu.edu> wrote:
> Um, I think that's what ARIN means when they say changing the registrant =
on a block from Entity A to Entity B means. =A0That's effectively 'reclaimi=
ng'.
>
> As I understand it, I think they also contend that the 'community' could =
say to ARIN 'take back X legacy block' and that ARIN would have no choice b=
ut to do it if the 'community' wished it so (via policy process, etc).
>
> On Feb 3, 2011, at 3:28 PM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
>
>> I think what John Curran is trying to say is that ARIN does not have
>> the authority to reclaim any space
>
>
>
Perhaps i'm missing the point, but my interpretation is that legacy
holders are sovereign and have the same standing in the community as
the RIR's. The only way to get that space back is to ask nicely or for
operators to stop routing legacy space. I very seriously doubt that it
is within ARIN's mission to form policy that directly impacts
non-members.
--=20
Jeffrey Lyon, Leadership Team
jeffrey.lyon@blacklotus.net | http://www.blacklotus.net
Black Lotus Communications - AS32421
First and Leading in DDoS Protection Solutions
