[136590] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: And so it ends...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ernie Rubi)
Thu Feb 3 16:00:54 2011
From: Ernie Rubi <ernesto@cs.fiu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim-hUoYeosWyPfAwT3JwDPRVFmRr+xO7haUcr3X@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 15:48:16 -0500
To: Jeffrey Lyon <jeffrey.lyon@blacklotus.net>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Um, I think that's what ARIN means when they say changing the registrant =
on a block from Entity A to Entity B means. That's effectively =
'reclaiming'. =20
As I understand it, I think they also contend that the 'community' could =
say to ARIN 'take back X legacy block' and that ARIN would have no =
choice but to do it if the 'community' wished it so (via policy process, =
etc).
On Feb 3, 2011, at 3:28 PM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> I think what John Curran is trying to say is that ARIN does not have
> the authority to reclaim any space
