[136472] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: quietly....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris Owen)
Thu Feb 3 10:23:13 2011
From: Chris Owen <owenc@hubris.net>
In-Reply-To: <4D4AC31F.1050000@brightok.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 09:05:31 -0600
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:00 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
> The concept of v4 to v6 addressing scale doesn't match the pricing =
scale, though. Generally, I expect to see most ISPs find themselves 1 =
rank higher in the v6 model compared to v4, which effectively doubles =
your price anyways. :)
Not sure I understand that one.
/19 =3D 500 /29s
/32 =3D 64,000 /48s
Shouldn't the v6 blocks be a lot bigger?
Chris
--
=
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Owen - Garden City (620) 275-1900 - Lottery (noun):
President - Wichita (316) 858-3000 - A stupidity tax
Hubris Communications Inc www.hubris.net
=
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
