[136470] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: quietly....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jack Bates)
Thu Feb 3 10:18:20 2011
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:00:47 -0600
From: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
To: Randy Carpenter <rcarpen@network1.net>
In-Reply-To: <1906085828.1923.1296700690262.JavaMail.root@zimbra.network1.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 2/2/2011 8:38 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
>
>> From the main section on https://www.arin.net/fees/fee_schedule.html:
>
> "... ISPs with both IPv4 resources and IPv6 resources pay the larger of the two fees."
>
> It is not mentioned anywhere in the waiver stuff.
>
The concept of v4 to v6 addressing scale doesn't match the pricing
scale, though. Generally, I expect to see most ISPs find themselves 1
rank higher in the v6 model compared to v4, which effectively doubles
your price anyways. :)
Jack
