[136393] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: quietly....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nick Hilliard)
Wed Feb 2 17:22:05 2011
X-Envelope-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 22:21:05 +0000
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
To: Matt Addison <matt.addison@lists.evilgeni.us>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=bmn7Q6rNeDQGi719=zNh29fw_o6rbTeQ5JPaL@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 02/02/2011 21:26, Matt Addison wrote:
> RA Guard has been described in RFC 6105 (still draft, but standards track),
> so that particular problem should be taken care of once vendors start
> shipping code. It doesn't even require SeND- although it does accomodate it.
wonderful. In the interim, it is sheer lunacy to enable ipv6 on a large
flat network if you can't synthesise ra guard with ipv6 packet filters.
yes, there are some switches out there which do it already. They are very
much in the minority.
Nick
