[136392] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: quietly....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Andrews)
Wed Feb 2 17:18:49 2011
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:42:23 CDT."
<25915.1296675743@localhost>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:18:25 +1100
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
In message <25915.1296675743@localhost>, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu writes:
> --==_Exmh_1296675743_5545P
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:30:23 EST, John Payne said:
> > On Feb 2, 2011, at 3:16 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> > > Example: if you give administrators the option of putting a router
> > > address in a DHCP option, they will do so and some fraction of the time,
> > > this will be the wrong address and things don't work. If you let routers
> > > announce their presence, then it's virtually impossible that something
> > > goes wrong because routers know who they are. A clear win. Of course it
> > > does mean that people <gasp> have to learn something new when adopting
> > > IPv6.
>
> > Is anyone else reading this and the word "condescending" _not_ popping
> > into their heads?
>
> The only other charitable conclusion I can draw is "Somebody hasn't spent tim
> e
> chasing down people with misconfigured laptops on the wireless who are squawk
> ing
> RA's for 2002:"
>
> There's a *big* operational difference between "all authorized and properly c
> onfigured
> routers know who they are" and "all nodes that think they're routers (deluded
> though
> they may be) know who they are".
Or you just filter them out in the laptop. With the proper tools you just
ignore and RA's containing 2002:. Done that for years now.
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
