[136216] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: A top-down RPKI model a threat to human freedom? (was Re:
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael Hallgren)
Tue Feb 1 18:55:25 2011
From: Michael Hallgren <m.hallgren@free.fr>
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=Rr6rrwqP8A7DbyMGP_RuZcDQTLJhM8+QQj4sS@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 00:51:26 +0100
Cc: nanog@nanog.org, carlos@lacnic.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Le mardi 01 février 2011 à 18:01 -0500, Christopher Morrow a écrit :
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Michael Hallgren <m.hallgren@free.fr> wrote:
> > Le mardi 01 février 2011 à 12:14 -0500, Christopher Morrow a écrit :
>
> >> countries do not have RIR's, countries have NIR's... regions have RIR's.
> >
> > In this context, at least, perhaps the NIR should be considered
> > superfluous or redundant? What is the operational rationale behind the
> > NIR level? Wouldn't a flatter RIR-LIR structure do just fine?
>
> some parts of the world are invested in the NIR ocncept... not my
> part, but I do admit other folks like it. (and I didn't want to leave
> someone out of the mix)
Neither do I, but I think it's a good thing to discuss. Any NIR rep's
around?
mh
