[136213] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: A top-down RPKI model a threat to human freedom? (was Re:
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael Hallgren)
Tue Feb 1 18:47:43 2011
From: Michael Hallgren <m.hallgren@free.fr>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m24o8nxvg5.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 00:47:42 +0100
Cc: NANOG Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Le mercredi 02 février 2011 à 07:04 +0900, Randy Bush a écrit :
> > In this context, at least, perhaps the NIR should be considered
> > superfluous or redundant? What is the operational rationale behind the
> > NIR level? Wouldn't a flatter RIR-LIR structure do just fine?
>
> and then, by inference, what is the use of the RIR level?
A meeting point for communities, potentially able to reflect a consensus
view of policies and moderate "NIR" and other might be more unilateral
initiatives. If one individual of a community goes "insane", enable the
remaing ones to modrate.
>
> randy
mh
