[136205] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: A top-down RPKI model a threat to human freedom? (was Re: Level
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Tue Feb 1 18:28:51 2011
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=Rr6rrwqP8A7DbyMGP_RuZcDQTLJhM8+QQj4sS@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:18:39 -0800
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org, carlos@lacnic.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Feb 1, 2011, at 3:01 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Michael Hallgren <m.hallgren@free.fr> =
wrote:
>> Le mardi 01 f=E9vrier 2011 =E0 12:14 -0500, Christopher Morrow a =
=E9crit :
>=20
>>> countries do not have RIR's, countries have NIR's... regions have =
RIR's.
>>=20
>> In this context, at least, perhaps the NIR should be considered
>> superfluous or redundant? What is the operational rationale behind =
the
>> NIR level? Wouldn't a flatter RIR-LIR structure do just fine?
>=20
> some parts of the world are invested in the NIR ocncept... not my
> part, but I do admit other folks like it. (and I didn't want to leave
> someone out of the mix)
I don't believe the NIRs would be part of the RPKI chain if I understand =
it
correctly.
Owen
