[136101] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: quietly....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com)
Tue Feb 1 06:54:42 2011
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 11:53:15 +0000
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <58A6EB9C-DCB5-40B9-A831-42F11FD141ED@muada.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>, carlos@lacnic.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 12:18:17PM +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 1 feb 2011, at 4:55, Jimmy Hess wrote:
>
> > IPv4's not dead yet; even the first RIR exhaustion probable in 3 -
> > 6 months doesn't end the IPv4 ride.
>
> IPv4 is very dead in the sense that it's not going to go anywhere in the future.
>
> The rest is just procrastination.
taking the long view - your statement applies equally to IPv6.
of course YMMV
--bill
