[136100] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: quietly....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Tue Feb 1 06:50:04 2011
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <5A6D953473350C4B9995546AFE9939EE0BC13776@RWC-EX1.corp.seven.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 03:45:50 -0800
To: "George Bonser" <gbonser@seven.com>
Cc: carlos@lacnic.net, NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Jan 31, 2011, at 10:43 PM, George Bonser wrote:
>>
>> 3. Busting out 16 more /8s only delays the IPv4 endgame by about a
>> year.
>>
>> jms
>
> If used for general assignment, sure. But if used for what people have
> been begging for NAT444 middle-4 space. Well, that might work. Code
> update on the CPE is all it would take. The systems involved would
> never see it.
>
>
If they could do code updates on the CPE, then, they could use RFC-1918.
The problem is that code-updating that much CPE is, well, impractical to
say the least.
Owen
