[13595] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Current prefix length filtering
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dorian R. Kim)
Tue Nov 11 16:04:20 1997
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 1997 15:49:56 -0500 (EST)
From: "Dorian R. Kim" <dorian@blackrose.org>
To: "Forrest W. Christian" <forrestc@iMach.com>
cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971111115652.21117A-100000@workhorse.iMach.com>
On Tue, 11 Nov 1997, Forrest W. Christian wrote:
> The real question I have for nanog is who is filtering on 209/8 for
> prefixes longer than /18? I'm quite concerned about connectivity to the
> customers I'm going to have to put in this /19. Have all the major
> providers started filtering on /19's or am I going to have major problems
> with this block?
Most people who filter recently allocated part of 192/2 space filter on
/19s. Sprint originally filtered on /18s but relaxed that to coordinate
better with registry allocation policies.
-dorian
