[13591] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Current prefix length filtering

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Forrest W. Christian)
Tue Nov 11 14:30:11 1997

Date: Tue, 11 Nov 1997 12:12:52 -0700 (MST)
From: "Forrest W. Christian" <forrestc@iMach.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu

I just recieved a new allocation from the internic.  I had requested an
/18 (based upon my previous allocation of an /18).  The internic
unfortunately has decided that an /19 is the largest block they can
justify allocating to me.  I don't want to get into an internic war here,
although I am not that happy about the size of the allocation, as I feel
that I've done everything right in conserving address space instead of
doing what some smaller providers do and allocate everyone a /24, which
would have consumed my /18 in 3 months instead of a year or so.

The real question I have for nanog is who is filtering on 209/8 for
prefixes longer than /18?  I'm quite concerned about connectivity to the
customers I'm going to have to put in this /19.  Have all the major
providers started filtering on /19's or am I going to have major problems
with this block?

Thanks,

forrestc@imach.com



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post