[135624] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Future of the IPv6 CPE survey on RIPE Labs - Your Input Needed
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jack Bates)
Thu Jan 27 09:18:35 2011
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:17:31 -0600
From: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
To: frnkblk@iname.com
In-Reply-To: <006d01cbbdef$7f425c80$7dc71580$@iname.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 1/27/2011 12:57 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> Have you looked at D-Link's DIR-825? It has most of the things you're
> looking for. The DIR-655 is a more affordable option.
>
Haven't had the chance to look at that one. Will check it out.
> In regards to (2), is it even possible to do DHCPv6-PD on with a SLAAC WAN?
>
It had better be, as IOS 12.2 SRE only supports SLAAC + DHCPv6-PD. Most
of the Cisco documentation I've seen, says that is their beautiful
layout. No more proxyarp/nd. Instead, assign a /64 to each subinterface,
perform SLAAC, then hand out prefixes via DHCPv6-PD if someone needs a
prefix.
> In regards to (3), I have that working on SRE, but with an external DHCP
> server.
>
Yeah, I could see the forwarding code supporting it. Cisco documentation
stated proxynd with rbe/unnumbered vlans isn't what they support. How
did your tests go mirroring the v4 method using dhcp forwarding with the
v6 method?
Jack
