[135605] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Future of the IPv6 CPE survey on RIPE Labs - Your Input Needed
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mohacsi Janos)
Thu Jan 27 04:19:41 2011
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:19:18 +0100 (CET)
From: Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi@niif.hu>
To: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinkMg+n6z8nZbxBD+9uRe5BBc2c+ceExbNQgqFp@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
--0-314938968-1296119958=:69156
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Richard Barnes wrote:
> Could you elaborate? Which circumstances?
>
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
>> It works for routing native IPv6 under some circumstances as well.
If the broadband service is provided with bridged mode (i.e. If your
router gets IPv4 via DHCP). As written PPPoE with IPv6 is not supported.
Regards,
Janos Mohacsi
>>
>> Owen
>>
>> On Jan 26, 2011, at 12:01 AM, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Franck Martin wrote:
>>>
>>>> What about an Airport Extreme? It has a wan interface that does PPPOE
>>>>
>>>> The IPv6 feature seems working, with 6to4 or static tunnels and a basic IPv6 firewall.
>>>
>>> Yes it is. I already reported to Marco.
>>> http://labs.ripe.net/Members/marco/content-ipv6-cpe-survey
>>>
>>> It should be included somehow in a matrix But 6to4 (or other tunneling techniques) is only a substitute of real IPv6.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Janos Mohacsi
>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Mirjam Kuehne" <mir@ripe.net>
>>>> To: nanog@nanog.org
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, 25 January, 2011 3:34:14 AM
>>>> Subject: Future of the IPv6 CPE survey on RIPE Labs - Your Input Needed
>>>>
>>>> [apologies for duplicates]
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Based on new information we received since the last publication, we
>>>> updated the IPv6 CPE matrix:
>>>>
>>>> http://labs.ripe.net/Members/mirjam/ipv6-cpe-survey-updated-january-2011
>>>>
>>>> In order to make this information more useful for a large user base, we
>>>> are preparing a detailed survey to gather more structural feedback about
>>>> the range of equipment that is currently in use. Not only would we like
>>>> you to participate in this survey, but we also ask for your help in
>>>> identifying the right survey questions. Please find a call for input on
>>>> RIPE Labs:
>>>>
>>>> http://labs.ripe.net/Members/marco/future-of-the-ipv6-cpe-survey-more-input-needed
>>>>
>>>> Kind Regards,
>>>> Mirjam Kuehne & Marco Hogewoning
>>>> RIPE NCC
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
--0-314938968-1296119958=:69156--
