[134915] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Routing Suggestions

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Wed Jan 12 19:18:22 2011

From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin1hx9ZGTWQ-WvB0AtdROu6iD+-ySOgGiH-oDF1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 19:18:11 -0500
To: Lars Carter <larsscarter@gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org


On Jan 12, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Lars Carter wrote:

> Hi NANOG list,
>=20
> I have a simple, hypothetical question regarding preferred =
connectivity
> methods for you guys that I would like to get the hive mind opinion =
about.
>=20
>=20
> There are two companies, Company A and Company B ... [ trimmed, but =
they want to interconnect directly, one does static, the other can do =
bgp]

> =46rom an technical, operational, and security standpoint what would =
be the
> preferred way to route traffic between these two networks?

I suggest using one of the reserved/private BGP asns for this purpose.

ASNumber:       64512 - 65535
ASName:         IANA-RSVD2
ASHandle:       AS64512
RegDate:        1995-04-06
Updated:        2009-01-14
Comment:        Designated for private use [RFC1930]

- Jared=


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post