[134929] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Routing Suggestions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (jim deleskie)
Wed Jan 12 20:22:58 2011
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTiktzrMWT8Y_wEXhG1TU9=G2Udo41J-X_yQ-H7n8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:21:10 -0400
From: jim deleskie <deleskie@gmail.com>
To: Joe Hamelin <joe@nethead.com>
Cc: NANOG@nanog.org, nanog-post@rsuc.gweep.net,
Lars Carter <larsscarter@gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
What Joe Said.
Static with 1918 space. If they NEED global space, explain 1918
space will work and tell them to use it.
-jim
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Joe Hamelin <joe@nethead.com> wrote:
>>> There are two companies, Company A and Company B, that are planning to
>>> continuously exchange a large amount of sensitive data and are located =
in a
>>> mutual datacenter. They decide to order a cross connect and peer privat=
ely
>>> for the obvious reasons.
>
> Second NIC on a secure server at "A" wired with a crossover cable to a
> second NIC a secure server at "B". Use an RFC1918 /30 that is null
> routed on both companies routers.
>
> KISS. =A0Hand it off to the developers.
>
> --
> Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
>
>
