[134904] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: co-location and access to your server
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeroen van Aart)
Wed Jan 12 16:37:18 2011
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:31:42 -0800
From: Jeroen van Aart <jeroen@mompl.net>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <4D2E1592.4090805@earthlink.net>
X-Assp-Envelope-From: jeroen@mompl.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
todd glassey wrote:
> On 1/12/2011 12:28 PM, Matt Kelly wrote:
>> When you are talking single or partial rack colo it is generally done
> policy. The ISP's limited access policy has to do with their overhead
> models and that's all there is to that.
>
> Sorry to bring daylight into this but it is what it is... YOU MUST plan
> for redundancy.
Thanks for all the replies, I understand that allowing access to other
people's servers unsupervised could be a bad idea. Problem for my
specific situation is that the 10 to 6 access is exactly the time I
generally am NOT in town.
I guess knowing who entered the building by means of a keycard and
having cameras isn't considered enough to deter potential "evil doers".
I know it's not enough for places like equinix, but that's of a
different caliber.
Thanks,
Jeroen
--
http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/plural-of-virus.html
