[134903] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Ferguson)
Wed Jan 12 16:35:34 2011
In-Reply-To: <37353.1294867004@localhost>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:28:23 -0800
From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster@gmail.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:16 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:13:43 EST, Scott Helms said:
>> Few home users have a stateful firewall configured
>
> What percent of home users are running a Windows older than XP SP2?
>
I don't have stats per specific XP SP version, but a sampling of OSs
visiting a blog that I admin:
43.40% WinXP
26.33% Win7
13.00% MacOSX
12.60% WinVista
1.60% unknown
1.00% iOS
0.87% Linux
0.87% Android
0.13% Win2003
0.13% Win2000
0.07% SymbianOS
Of course, this is just a sampling that may or may not be relevant.
- - ferg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003)
wj8DBQFNLhzuq1pz9mNUZTMRAgN0AJ4hrUq0qSfLLNMWq6RAXleb8bya2ACglxTU
tT/sP0oVu89WeWrG6XodcKU=3D
=3D+pa8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=20
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
=A0Engineering Architecture for the Internet
=A0fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
=A0ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
