[134898] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Wed Jan 12 16:22:42 2011
To: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:21:24 PST."
<AANLkTi=0UXXE61GTba1ZEH0DP_Ba_h-KUXvq8iuifTtQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:18:17 -0500
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1294867097_34736P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:21:24 PST, Paul Ferguson said:
> Try this at home, with/without NAT:
>
> 1. Buy a new PC with Windows installed
> 2. Install all security patches needed since the OS was installed
>
> Without NAT, you're unpatched PC will get infected in less than 1 minute.
What release of Windows?
--==_Exmh_1294867097_34736P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFNLhqZcC3lWbTT17ARAgsjAKDcB77utynmus6D11wvL/XE1R/3FwCg5hY8
cjalEeyYNuUy7QJmWGVH7QU=
=LVRo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1294867097_34736P--
