[134884] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Miquel van Smoorenburg)
Wed Jan 12 15:45:06 2011
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:37:47 +0100
From: "Miquel van Smoorenburg" <mikevs@xs4all.net>
To: khelms@ispalliance.net
In-Reply-To: <4D2E0B77.9060504@ispalliance.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
In article <xs4all.4D2E0B77.9060504@ispalliance.net>,
Scott Helms <khelms@ispalliance.net> wrote:
>Few home users have a stateful firewall configured and AFAIK none of the
>consumer models come with a good default set of rules much less a drop
>all unknown.
The v6 capable CPEs for home users I've seen so far all include
stateful firewalling with inbound default deny.
(including the one I'm using right now)
Is your experience with such CPEs any different ?
Mike.
