[134862] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Wed Jan 12 14:12:55 2011
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D2DDFCC.3020906@brightok.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:08:30 -0800
To: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Jan 12, 2011, at 9:07 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
>=20
>=20
> On 1/12/2011 11:01 AM, George Bonser wrote:
>> NAT66 is just
>> straight static NAT that maps one prefix to a different prefix.
>>=20
>=20
> I'd eat a hat if a vendor didn't implement a PAT equivalent. It's =
demanded too much. There is money for it, so it will be there.
>=20
>=20
> Jack
Fortunately, so far, it isn't. Hopefully we can cure the demand through =
education instead of acquiescence and profiteering.
Owen
