[134845] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jack Bates)
Wed Jan 12 12:08:41 2011
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:07:24 -0600
From: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
To: George Bonser <gbonser@seven.com>
In-Reply-To: <5A6D953473350C4B9995546AFE9939EE0BC132F5@RWC-EX1.corp.seven.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 1/12/2011 11:01 AM, George Bonser wrote:
> NAT66 is just
> straight static NAT that maps one prefix to a different prefix.
>
I'd eat a hat if a vendor didn't implement a PAT equivalent. It's
demanded too much. There is money for it, so it will be there.
Jack
